1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to clarify an existing protocol?
Yes, we currently have no way to use multiple SASL or otherwise to acheive a similar result.
2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and requirements?
Yes. However it does lack any way to support indicating to the server which credential will be used, other than perhaps by implication from the SASL mechanism.
3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not, why not?
Yes, I have implemented this for xmpp.js -- except for "tasks" which I have not implemented and I think there are no official profiles of, making that a somewhat more risky area of the spec.
4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification?
No, only usability concerns outlined above
5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
Yes
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
