On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:11 PM Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote:
> 3) It's really not. Some clients and intermediaries need to know whether they > should expect a marker or not. No need to check this prior to sending a > <markable/>, true, but useful to track missing markers afterward. > > Where was the discussion of this, and (more broadly) how does one know what > the discussion and rationale and consensus is if not on this list? I can add it back. When I showed this to people in the XSF room I guess most people just considered the "does it hurt to opportunistically include the <markable/>" side of things. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
