Le mercredi 21 août 2024, 17:17:47 UTC+2 Goffi a écrit : > Le mardi 20 août 2024, 18:35:52 UTC+2 Stephen Paul Weber a écrit : > > >I have already indicated my willingness > > >to evolve the proposal towards a single Jingle session > > > > Once it uses a single Jingle session, what is even left for the XEP to say > > that isn't covered by existing Jingle XEPs? > > Hi Singpolyma, > > Thank you for your answer. > > Just because a specification is small doesn't mean it's not useful. > > Currently, there is no way to handle an A/V conference room in XMPP. This > protoXEP specifies how to join an A/V conference room, use metadata, > implement > the discovery mechanism, determine the identity to use, and configure the > room. > Its concise nature is deliberate, aimed at facilitating easy implementation, > but it remains a necessary component for making A/V conference calls. > > Without it, we have currently no way to make SFU-based conference calls. > > Furthermore, I plan to extend this specification by adding functionality to > retrieve joined users and notify new joiners, as the SFU may choose not to > send all participants' streams. > > I'd also like to mention that I have a working implementation of this > protoXEP, utilizing a server component based on Galène. > > Regards, > Goffi
So, what are the steps to make an updated proposal acceptable?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
