On 13/06/2025 13.08, Guus der Kinderen wrote:
Ah, yes, that seems very relevant, thank you!As RFC 6120 does not describe "presence sessions", it doesn't describe "Available Resources" either (as those are closely related to presence). That's all in RFC 6121. In that reasoning, it makes sense to look back at RFC 6120 to find specifications related to "Connected Resources" (rather than "Available Resources".Two things do not sit well with me: * The usage of the term "active resource" in RFC 6121, which appears to be an artifact of RFC 3920/3921. I believe that term should not be used at all in RFC 6121. * The section titles in RFC 6121 suggest that specifications are provided for "Connected Resources", which they do not appear to do at all.Would it be appropriate to suggest editorial changes to the RFC, in an attempt to remove some ambiguity?
Yes, please do so. An RFC errata record will be very helpful once a new revision of the RFCs is on its way.
- Flow
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
