Greetings. Peter.

I beg your pardon.

I have interpreted your message instead of realizing it.

Albeit, the issue appears to be solved, the solution that you offer
seems to be perfect, and it could serve me in other projects as well.

I will make a note of it and experiment with it.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Schimon

On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:14:15 +0300
Schimon Jehudah <[email protected]> wrote:

> Peter. Good evening.
> 
> Thank you for your advise!
> 
> However, that might not work with accounts on servers that restrict
> PEP.
> 
> Nevertheless, I will experiment with PEP as you advised.
> 
> Kind reagrds,
> Schimon
> 
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 09:41:07 +0000
> Peter Waher <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hello Schimon (etl al)
> >   
> > > I am working on a news service for XMPP, which sends messages
> > > according to status.
> > >
> > > When JID is offline, service should stop.    
> > 
> > Sounds like you would benefit from using PEP (XEP-0163) which
> > accomplishes this. The publisher publishes a PEP event with its new
> > service namespace, and only online entities with a presence
> > subscription, and a corresponding service-detectable feature
> > requesting PEP events with the corresponding news namespace, will
> > receive the event. In this case, there's no need for the service to
> > manually check subscribers and their current online presence.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Peter Waher  
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to