> On the other side, I do acknowledge that using a CI-based system for
> contributions has its advantage. Therefore, a change which mentions that
> we also accept contributions via Github, outlining the existence of a CI
> there, would be acceptable to me.

Codeberg exists :) As well as Sourcehut.

My org has moved all of our projects over to Codeberg, and the experience has 
been great (aside from the AI scrapebots plaguing the internet). Their hosted 
Woodpecker CI is also pretty easy to configure, with an option to host your own 
CI. Federation is also in the works, so a self-hosted Forgejo instance would be 
able to sync up with contributors on Codeberg.

Anyway, thank you for keeping the email-based workflow intact.

All the best
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to