While I do appreciate some of the publication of IETF, I do not think that it deserves any attention, especially not our attention, of the people of XMPP, for the IETF has rejected Atomsub (Atom Over XMPP).
I do sense, that we should further incorporate more PPN (Peer-to-peer Network) means into XMPP, and let thise "HTTP people" to "play" with their own "soup", for a lack of a better phrase. Lest forget that in the past those organizations have formed the "Peer-to-peer Working Group" (peer-to-peerwg.org) in order to gradually suppress P2P, not to promote it. Schimon On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 13:42:31 -0600 Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > No, the subject line of this message is not a joke. :-) > > The IETF has formed a "TIPTOP" working group to study and adapt > Internet protocols for communication over interplanetary distances. > [1] If anyone here is interested in this topic, I encourage you read > their documents [2] and sign up for their email discussion list [3]. > > Thanks for your attention! > > Peter > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tiptop/about/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tiptop/documents/ > [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/deepspace/ > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
