On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 at 14:55, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/20/25 4:46 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > > > At minimum, I think a document, somewhere, should provide advice on what > > security stuff to implement and why in 2025, and include the MTIs for > > such things, and be kept current. > > It sounds like we need a replacement for RFC 7590, which was published > in June 2015. The IETF's UTA WG is still operational, so the work could > happen there; alternatively, we could publish a XEP (easier to update), > although we might want to coordinate with the UTA WG chairs to at least > inform them of the effort at the XSF. > I'll take "RFCs I have forgotten about" for 400, Peter. But yes, that one, but with SASL and Channel Bindings and such things. Dave.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
