It’s also worth adding that it would make sense to have a PEP service for the server itself (i.e., at `example.org` instead of `[email protected]`), which would simplify several use cases, including the XEP-0485 one. This would avoid the problem stated in § 7 Privacy Considerations:
> The mere presence of an applicable pub-sub node MUST NOT be used for Service > Discovery purposes, as under common service configuration, non-administrative > users are allowed to create such nodes. As with a PEP for the server itself, non-administrative users could not create anything. This PEP for server itself idea was already proposed by Mathieu Pasquet with an earlier version of XEP-0455. Best, Goffi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
