3. Define a disco feature that mentions the context, e.g. urn:xmpp:blocking:reporting:1- Because it is intended that the generic element is used in multipleother contexts, the first use case should not claim the generic namespace urn:xmpp:reporting:1.
I agree with everything except this. Why is it insufficient to say "if you support both blocking and reporting then you support reporting in blocking" ?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
