On Mon, 11 May 2026 at 15:19, Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]> wrote:
> >I have absolutely no doubt that the ProtoXEP is not at the quality gate > >we'd require for Stable, but I would like to actually bring it into the > XSF > >and work on it with the rest of the participants in this SIG, under the > >XSF's IPR policy. > > Seems that is already happening here :) A ProtoXEP Submission is prior to the IPR policy. I've not assigned copyright yet, that happens on Publication. If we were to finalise all XEPs prior to them entering Experimental, then firsty what's the point of Experimental, and secondly they'd all be outside the IPR policy, and a bad actor could then take them away and (for example) charge access. Dave.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
