I wasn't starting a discussion about Starlink the business. I was talking about 
Starlink the technology and the "dreams" that people project onto that 
technology.
 
I'm happy if the current customers are happy and remain happy. Just pointing 
out that there are pretty severe limitations in the physical capabilities of 
the technology of the satellites and dishys that will limit how many customers 
can be served in an area.
 
I was reacting to the idea Dave Taht brought up that somehow the satellites can 
cover "more" area per satellite, if they go to a lower total bit rate (175 vs. 
240 per antenna on each satellite).
 
I'm a radio engineer, trained in stuff like phased array antenna designs, and 
power, etc. I'm also a communications protocol engineer, trained in 
multiplexing techniques.
 
I'm not saying Starlink engineers are incompetent, but I am saying that what 
Musk (who despite the fact that he pretends to be an engineer is not one, never 
has been one) has described in his visionary speeches is not what Starlink is 
delivering today, and that's because it basically can't be delivered.
 
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

Reply via email to