This MIT paper went by today. It's really good. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4178804
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:07 AM Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > They need to match the bandwidth to the buffering. RFC7567 ain't rocket > science. > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 6:46 AM warren ponder via Starlink > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Great description Mike. Elon acknowledged this 12+ months ago. 'Need more > > ground stations and less foolish routing' > > > > As Dave said though it mind blowing how tech writers come up with stuff. > > Granted SL does not really engage in that area but there are so many > > resources available and willing to validate their articles you would think > > they would have the integrity to use them. > > > > WP > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, 5:01 AM Mike Puchol via Starlink > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Satellites don’t get re-positioned, they are in orbital planes and slots, > >> to move them is expensive in time and fuel, thus, once they have been > >> placed, they stay. You can see how the constellation operates at > >> starlink.sx - you’ll quickly notice why coverage is a function of gateway > >> availability, the constellation has enough density. > >> > >> The issues in the US are twofold - many customers added while not enough > >> satellite capacity is available (the first constellation is only about 50% > >> complete), and many gateways only have half the spectrum available, > >> reducing available througput. > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Mike > >> On Sep 22, 2022 at 13:42 +0200, Andrew Crane via Starlink > >> <[email protected]>, wrote: > >> > >> Even senior reporters for tech publications have been conditioned to not > >> look beyond "speed" numbers. > >> > >> OT I wonder if the woes in North America are caused by the unplanned > >> repositioning of satellites for Ukraine coverage. > >> ~ Andrew > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 2:35 PM Dave Taht via Starlink > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I still find it remarkable that reporters are still missing the > >>> meaning of the huge latencies for starlink, under load. Just look at > >>> the > >>> > >>> https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-speeds-drop-significantly-in-the-us-amid-congestion-woes > >>> > >>> -- > >>> FQ World Domination pending: > >>> https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ > >>> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Starlink mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Starlink mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Starlink mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Starlink mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > > > > -- > FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC -- FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC _______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
