I think using "speed" for "the inverse of delay" is pretty normal English, if 
technically erroneous when speaking nerd or physicist.

Using it for volume? Arguably more like fraudulent...

--dave

On 1/4/23 18:54, Bruce Perens via Starlink wrote:
On the other hand, we would like to be comprehensible to normal users, 
especially when we want them to press their providers to deal with bufferbloat. 
Differences like speed and rate would go right over their heads.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:16 PM Ulrich Speidel via Starlink 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The use of the term "speed" in communications used to be restricted to the speed of light (or 
whatever propagation speed one happened to be dealing with. Everything else was a "rate". Maybe I'm 
old-fashioned but I think talking about "speed tests" muddies the waters rather a lot.

--
****************************************************************
Dr. Ulrich Speidel

Department of Computer Science

Room 303S.594
Ph: (+64-9)-373-7599 ext. 85282

The University of Auckland
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~ulrich/<http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/%7Eulrich/>
****************************************************************
________________________________
From: Starlink 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on 
behalf of rjmcmahon via Starlink 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 9:02 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Cake List <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; IETF IPPM WG 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; libreqos <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Dave 
Taht via Starlink <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Rpm 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; bloat 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] [Rpm] the grinch meets cloudflare's christmas present

Curious to why people keep calling capacity tests speed tests? A semi at
55 mph isn't faster than a porsche at 141 mph because its load volume is
larger.

Bob
HNY Dave and all the rest,

Great to see yet another capacity test add latency metrics to the
results. This one looks like a good start.

Results from my Windstream DOCSIS 3.1 line (3.1 on download only, up
is 3.0) Gigabit down / 35Mbps up provisioning. Using an IQrouter Pro
(an i5 x86) with Cake set for 710/31 as this ISP can’t deliver
reliable low-latency unless you shave a good bit off the targets. My
local loop is pretty congested.

Here’s the latest Cloudflare test:




And an Ookla test run just afterward:




They are definitely both in the ballpark and correspond to other tests
run from the router itself or my (wired) MacBook Pro.

Cheers,

Jonathan


On Jan 4, 2023, at 12:26 PM, Dave Taht via Rpm
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Please try the new, the shiny, the really wonderful test here:
https://speed.cloudflare.com/<https://speed.cloudflare.com>

I would really appreciate some independent verification of
measurements using this tool. In my brief experiments it appears - as
all the commercial tools to date - to dramatically understate the
bufferbloat, on my LTE, (and my starlink terminal is out being
hacked^H^H^H^H^H^Hworked on, so I can't measure that)

My test of their test reports 223ms 5G latency under load , where
flent reports over 2seconds. See comparison attached.

My guess is that this otherwise lovely new tool, like too many,
doesn't run for long enough. Admittedly, most web objects (their
target market) are small, and so long as they remain small and not
heavily pipelined this test is a very good start... but I'm pretty
sure cloudflare is used for bigger uploads and downloads than that.
There's no way to change the test to run longer either.

I'd love to get some results from other networks (compared as usual to
flent), especially ones with cake on it. I'd love to know if they
measured more minimum rtts that can be obtained with fq_codel or cake,
correctly.

Love Always,
The Grinch

--
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
<image.png><tcp_nup-2023-01-04T090937.211620.LTE.flent.gz>_______________________________________________
Rpm mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm


_______________________________________________
Rpm mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink


--
Bruce Perens K6BP



_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink


--
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 |              -- Mark Twain


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any 
and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the 
person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or 
disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If 
you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox 
and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an 
express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor 
does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a 
contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject 
to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding 
until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized 
signatory.
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

Reply via email to