On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Evan Prodromou <e...@status.net> wrote:
> I'd like to make the following fine-tuning changes to !groups in 0.9.x: > > 1. If you mention a !group, *even if the notice is not distributed to > the group*, the name gets linkified as a tag. > 2. *At the group admins' discretion*, non-members can be allowed to > post to a group. The default is set by the site admin. Example use case: a > !support group for asking for tech support on identi.ca. > 3. At the site admin's discretion, groups can share the same (logical) > namespace as users. In this case, you can't have a group named "foo" * > and* a user named "foo". > 4. At the site admin's discretion, "@name" will send a group message, > just like !group. (This will clearly work best when there's no confusion > whether "@name" is for a user named "name" or a group named "name" -- that > is, when 3 is enabled.) > > -Evan > > So item 3 is only so that item 4 will work? Is there any other usefulness to it?
_______________________________________________ StatusNet-dev mailing list StatusNet-dev@lists.status.net http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
