On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 00:23 +0000, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote: > Olá Sarven e a todos. > > On Thursday 26 November 2009 16:36:11 Sarven Capadisli wrote: > > * B: redented notices > > We dont have anything to track this right now AFAIK > > > * G: notice contains URL > > "Hey spammers"
You as a self-proclaimed "stats freak" :) might imagine that we wouldn't just simply give a point to each URL in a notice, we'd be smarter about it. For instance, take a large enough sample of notices and check the URL to notice ratio and use an arbitrary standard deviation to come up with what might be considered as a healthy range for URL to notices. > > * K: user's profile completeness > > Too subjective Perhaps. The point is to derive at a good enough signal to noise ratio for any user. No particular criteria is more important than the other. What's the point? * Discovery of particular type of users * Measure User's Impact in the community -Sarven _______________________________________________ StatusNet-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
