On 3/3/10 3:02 AM, Dave Hall wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just signed up to the list, but have been using status.net via > identi.ca for a year or so. I wrote my first plugin last month - > http://davehall.com.au/blog/dave/2010/02/20/group-redent-plugin-statusnet-identica > Now I feel like I am ready to contribute something back to the core, even > though there is a fair bit of self interest in the contribution. > > I would like to see status.net (and identi.ca) support X mail headers > for messages sent from the service. I would propose the following > headers > > X-StatusNet-Domain: <site-fqdn> > X-StatusNet-TargetUser: <nickname> > X-StatusNet-SourceUser: <nickname> > X-StatusNet-MessageType: (message|subscribe|nudge|fave|mention)
What does Twitter do in this regard? I don't think we necessarily need or want to mimic what they do, but if they are providing similar headers to the ones you propose, there's probably code out there taking advantage of them that can easily be repurposed to work with StatusNet. So we might want to make our X mail headers somewhat similar. Just something to think about. z -- Zach Copley z...@status.net - http://identi.ca/zach
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ StatusNet-dev mailing list StatusNet-dev@lists.status.net http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
