Martin Sebor wrote: > Liviu Nicoara wrote: > > But first a few things about the process :)
Will follow. > > That looks okay. I'm just not too excited about the duplication > if the code between lib and .DEFAULT. Is there an easy way to > avoid it? Not excited about that either. I spent some time thinking about it but I cannot find an easier way in that many lines of code. > > >>I removed the useless builddir target in TOPDIR. > > > I guess that's okay, too, except that we will now also need to remove > the comment explaining builddir. I'm not sure why it was even there if > it didn't do anything. How does BUILDDIR get created now? By including > makefile.in? Yep, it always did it this way. >>I added dependencies in the BUILDDIR invocations of make (else branch). > > > I think we had those at some point in the past. IIRC, I took them out > because I thought it was cleaner to have them in the individual (sub) > makefiles instead. I.e., the top level makefile shouldn't need to know > all the dependencies of each subcomponent. It easy to miss some (such > as the dependency of tests on rwtest). I will look into it. Liviu
