Martin Sebor wrote: > Liviu Nicoara wrote: > >>>>I think we had those at some point in the past. IIRC, I took them out >>>>because I thought it was cleaner to have them in the individual (sub) >>>>makefiles instead. I.e., the top level makefile shouldn't need to know >>>>all the dependencies of each subcomponent. It easy to miss some (such >>>>as the dependency of tests on rwtest).
> I see. Would including the .d files conditionally, only if config.h > exists, be a way to solve the problem? Not really. It would mean we'd build the library w/o the dependencies. Liviu
