Martin Sebor wrote: > The test still aborts due to the bug you mentioned but passes with your suggested patch so it looks like we have a solution. Unless you can think of any reason why we shouldn't apply it I'll go > ahead and commit it tomorrow.
I think we may apply the changes. Martin Sebor wrote: > Yes, eventually we should. Please open an enhancement in Jira so we don't forget. For now, let's just enhance the tests that are the most likely to have problems. I.e., any tests that allocate > any temporary storage (other than on the stack). New jira issue is created: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-139 Thanks, Anton Pevtsov -----Original Message----- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 06:07 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: test for lib.alg.partitions Anton Pevtsov wrote: > Martin, here is the updated test version - I added checks for X > objects leaks (or unexpected dtor calls). Great! I updated the test with this change: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=375448&view=rev The test still aborts due to the bug you mentioned but passes with your suggested patch so it looks like we have a solution. Unless you can think of any reason why we shouldn't apply it I'll go ahead and commit it tomorrow. > I plan to implement the exception-safity test for this algorithm Okay. > (and I > think we need to implement such tests for each algorithm, don't we?). Yes, eventually we should. Please open an enhancement in Jira so we don't forget. For now, let's just enhance the tests that are the most likely to have problems. I.e., any tests that allocate any temporary storage (other than on the stack). Thanks Martin
