Anton Pevtsov wrote:
Martin, here is the fix to this bug:
http://people.apache.org/~antonp/stdcxx06162006/scripts/

Thanks a lot!
Please check it in.
Martin



With best wishes,
Anton Pevtsov


-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Sebor (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 23:38
To: [email protected]
Subject: [jira] Updated: (STDCXX-202) [Windows] failed config tests
labeled "ok"


     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-202?page=all ]

Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-202:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: log.text

The full log file is attached.


[Windows] failed config tests labeled "ok"
------------------------------------------

        Key: STDCXX-202
        URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-202
    Project: C++ Standard Library
       Type: Bug


 Components: Configuration
   Versions: 4.1.3
Environment: Windows
   Reporter: Martin Sebor
   Assignee: Anton Pevtsov
   Priority: Trivial
Attachments: log.text

The Windows configuration infrastructure incorrectly labels some failled tests as passing (i.e., "ok"). The labeling should be

consistent across all config tests (i.e., "ok" when a test passes and
"no (<macro-name>)" when it fails; <macro-name> is the name of the macro
that is #defined in response to the failure; it should be enclosed in
parentheses and the whole thing separated from the word "no" by a single
space).

------ Build started: Project: .configure, Configuration: 15d Debug

Thread-safe
Dll Win32 ------
Performing Custom Build Step
Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.6
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1996-2001. All rights reserved.
Configuring for msvc-7.1 - 15d Debug Thread-safe Dll
Checking if compiler is sane...   ok
Checking if linker is sane...   ok
Checking if run environment is sane...   ok
Checking system architecture ILP32 little endian
Checking for headers... ...
Checking for <ieeefp.h>...  no (_RWSTD_NO_IEEEFP_H)
Checking for <pthread.h>...  no (_RWSTD_NO_PTHREAD_H)
Checking for namespaces  ok
...
Checking for std::vsprintf() in <cstdio>...   ok
Checking for std::snprintf() in <cstdio>...  no _RWSTD_NO_SNPRINTF
...
checking for atomic operations... ok checking for bad_alloc copy ctor... ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_COPY_CTOR
checking for bad_alloc default ctor...   ok

_RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_DEFAULT_CTOR

checking for bad_alloc dtor...   ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_DTOR
checking for bad_alloc::what()...   ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_WHAT
...



Reply via email to