Farid Zaripov wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: std::getline() declaration header
Farid Zaripov wrote:
At the moment the functions std::getline (basic_istream&,
basic_string&)
std::getline (basic_istream&, basic_string&, delim) and
operator>> (basic_istream&, basic_string&) are declared in <istream>
header file, but according to "21.2 Header <string> synopsis" they
should be declared in <string> header file.
Is this detectable? I.e., do you have a test case or is it
something you found by inspection of the code?
I've found it during compiling the boost on cygwin.
I've created the issue (the test case inside):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-375
I don't think the test case is valid. It expects std::istream
to be a complete type but it only #includes <iosfwd> and not
<istream>. <iosfwd> only declares the type (which need not
make it complete). Let me know if you disagree or if you
have a test case that detects it w/o relying on istream
being a complete type.
Martin
