Farid Zaripov wrote:
The results of the regression tests are here: http://people.apache.org/~faridz/status/cs-win32-full.html
Great, thanks for posting these! Do you happen to have the same set of results with the native C++ Standard Library that we could use as a baseline for comparison? Skimming quickly through the results I see a lot of compilation errors due to the same incorrect assumptions about which headers symbols are referenced in as in the rest of Boost. We should open bugs for those as well (any preference for how to handle those?) I also noticed quite a number of exceptions due to no RTTI data. I wonder if we might need a compiler option to enable RTTI when building the tests or perhaps even the library. Then there are a whole bunch of linker errors LNK1104. Any idea what those are about? Did those libraries fail to build? Is it because the tests were built with /Zc:wchar_t and our library wasn't? Also, we might want to #define _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE on the command line to reduce the noise from all those darn useless deprecation warnings. Martin
