Scott Zhong wrote:
in the for loop, why __lo char_type length isn't being tested?
I'm not sure what you mean. What length isn't being tested
and why should it be?
Martin
in _ctype.cc line 141:
template <class _CharT>
/* virtual */ const _TYPENAME ctype<_CharT>::char_type*
ctype<_CharT>::
do_narrow (const char_type *__lo, const char_type *__hi,
char __dfault, char *__dest) const
{
_RWSTD_ASSERT (__lo <= __hi);
_RWSTD_ASSERT (!__lo || __dest);
for (; __lo < __hi; ++__lo, ++__dest)
*__dest = narrow (*__lo, __dfault);
return __hi;
}
Yu (Scott) Zhong
