Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
On May 21, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
I agree it would be a spectacular demonstration of the usefulness of
the tool but -- based on my knowledge of the stdcxx code -- I
strongly doubt I can demonstrate an MT bug in it. Do you know of an
unresolved MT bug in stdcxx?
There is a problem in locale (as usual, sigh :( A couple of our
thread safety tests have been crashing: 22_mt and 22_time_put_mt.
I see they are not ported to the new infrastructure yet. Are they
failing in dev or latest release? One [looong] run of 22_mt yielded no
failures.
It's the latest code that fails (the //stdcxx/ depot in Perforce).
Martin
