> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 8:23 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC] > > >> Jira for the "bug in rw_match(&char, &char, 1)." > > But is that really a bug in rw_match()? It looks to me > more like a design limitation than a bug. In the case of the > wchar_t* and UserChar* overloads of rw_match() there should > be a simple solution: make sure the first (char*) argument > has enough elements (it should be easy to guarantee that > since the argument is the hardcoded string we match against). > And changing the char* overload to behave the same as the > other two, i.e., to only do the expansion on the first > argument and not on the second should fix that case, no?
The problem is in that rw_match() used to compare single characters. There no problem in compare one character NUL-terminated string (i.e. "b" or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"). We should not use rw_match() to compare single characters. Farid.
