> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 7:12 AM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r553587 - > /incubator/stdcxx/trunk/tests/self/0.new.cpp > > > No, because of _config-msvcrt.h, line 151: > > > > // operator new and delete is not reliably replaceable across > > // shared library boundaries, which includes the shared library > > // version of the language support library #define > > _RWSTD_NO_REPLACEABLE_NEW_DELETE > > > > Shall we install SIGSEGV signal handler only if > > _RWSTD_NO_REPLACEABLE_NEW_DELETE macro is #defined ? > > Right. Then the test for the replacement operator new should > be guarded by the macro, shouldn't it?
I think it should, but then the all 0.new.cpp test should be guarded by the macro, because of all test cases in this test are excercising the replacement new/delete operators: /*********************************************************************** **** * * 0.new.cpp - test exercising replacement operator new and delete Farid.
