I agree. Unless someone has a better idea (hint -- it would
be nice to get feedback from others as well :) I'll go with
trunk.
Martin
Andrew Black wrote:
The only benefit I can see in using <version>-dev over trunk, is it
would provide a view into what release the bug was discovered (and
fixed) in. This assistance may be offset by the extra maintenance
hassle of creating the new name every release, and having to deal with
people inadvertently reporting bugs as being part of a previous trunk
version.
My tendency is to cast a vote for using 'trunk'.
--Andrew Black
Martin Sebor wrote:
It occurs to me that our current process of assigning bugs
to a yet unreleased branch (e.g., 4.2) might lead to the
misleading impression after the branch is released that it
was/is full of bugs even though all the bugs may have been
resolved before the release went out the door. I think we
need a separate version entry in Jira for regressions
introduced during development. Any suggestions for what
this entry ought to be? Would labeling them simply "trunk"
work or is there any benefit in being more specific (e.g.,
<version>-dev)?
Martin
