>Martin Sebor wrote: > >Travis, this test looks too good -- there's nothing for me to pick >on, not even formatting! ;-) >
I'm _finally_ getting used to it. > >I'm running it on a 4 CPU dual core Xeon against a locally modified >trunk and so far so good. Has it ever failed in your tests? > I have yet to see a failure in the num_get.mt test. I've only tested on win32/vc8 and linux/gcc though. That brings up an important question that isn't covered on the patch submission rules page. Should I be testing on all platforms available, or should I just do enough testing to convince myself that the test is portable and is working correctly? Travis
