Doh! I should know better. Here is the results from a 12d build on the same hardware.
normal patched ------ 1 threads ------ 1 threads ms 934 ms 1015 ms/op 0.00005567 ms/op 0.00006050 ------ 2 threads ------ 2 threads ms 6049 ms 6266 ms/op 0.00036055 ms/op 0.00037348 ------ 4 threads ------ 4 threads ms 11948 ms 11813 ms/op 0.00071216 ms/op 0.00070411 ------ 8 threads ------ 8 threads ms 23855 ms 24743 ms/op 0.00142187 ms/op 0.00147480 Martin Sebor wrote: > >8d is not thread-safe so the atomic function templates should >be implemented in terms of ordinary increments and decrements >(if they aren't it's a bug). They should only expand to the >atomic assembly (or the Win32 Interlocked) functions in 12X >and 15X build types. > >Martin >
