William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Just a heads up: I plan to make this change today. If anyone has
any concerns, please speak up now.
The trouble of course is that you break local checkouts unless those
folks use 'svn switch' to flip the repository location.
One alternative is to leave 4.2.0 in place for now, and fix this at
the time you move the entire svn from it's incubation location over
to a TLP (top level project) subversion location, which breaks everyone
anyways.
Hmm. I admit I hadn't thought of the local checkout problem. Your
suggestion sounds most sensible. The only concern I have is that
we may not graduate before the release. (I guess I'd better hurry
up with the proposal!) Maybe we could do both: leave 4.2.0 in
place for now and also create 4.2 (or 4.2.x like APR would). Then,
during the transition, we would drop 4.2.0. Does that seem like
a good plan?
Martin
