Travis Vitek wrote:
[...]
The formatting code is also slightly buggy
because it doesn't account for integer promotion and sign extension.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Can you give an example of how this
would be a problem?
This was a thinko on my part. We're not concerned about the formatting
of arbitrary character values (e.g., '\x80' and unexpectedly getting
back -128 instead of 128 when char is a signed type) but just the two
values, CHAR_MAX and CHAR_MIN, and we do expect to see the negative
value when CHAR_MIN is negative. Sorry about that!
Martin
