[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-492:
--------------------------------
Attachment: 21.string.append.perf.cpp
I created a little more comprehensive test to verify the timing of all of the
append related functions. It just displays the system time, because I couldn't
find an immediate way to get the user time on windows. Source code attached...
before [win32]
4.484000 [string::append(string, size_type, size_type)]
1.484000 [string::append(string)]
1.235000 [string::append(const_pointer, size_type)]
1.594000 [string::append(const_pointer)]
2.765000 [string::append(iterator, iterator)]
2.516000 [string::append(size_type, value_type)]
1.453000 [string::operator+=(string)]
1.578000 [string::operator+=(const_pointer)]
2.407000 [string::operator+=(value_type)]
0.546000 [string::push_back(value_type)]
after [win32]
1.718000 [string::append(string, size_type, size_type)]
1.469000 [string::append(string)]
1.234000 [string::append(const_pointer, size_type)]
1.578000 [string::append(const_pointer)]
2.766000 [string::append(iterator, iterator)]
1.093000 [string::append(size_type, value_type)]
1.469000 [string::operator+=(string)]
1.578000 [string::operator+=(const_pointer)]
0.547000 [string::operator+=(value_type)]
0.547000 [string::push_back(value_type)]
before [linux]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 656 % ./21.string.append.perf
14.216000 [string::append(string, size_type, size_type)]
1.968000 [string::append(string)]
1.838000 [string::append(const_pointer, size_type)]
3.934000 [string::append(const_pointer)]
2.986000 [string::append(iterator, iterator)]
7.053000 [string::append(size_type, value_type)]
1.950000 [string::operator+=(string)]
4.069000 [string::operator+=(const_pointer)]
7.056000 [string::operator+=(value_type)]
0.338000 [string::push_back(value_type)]
after [linux]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 565 % ./21.string.append.perf
2.854000 [string::append(string, size_type, size_type)]
1.985000 [string::append(string)]
1.856000 [string::append(const_pointer, size_type)]
3.938000 [string::append(const_pointer)]
3.040000 [string::append(iterator, iterator)]
1.106000 [string::append(size_type, value_type)]
1.969000 [string::operator+=(string)]
4.209000 [string::operator+=(const_pointer)]
0.325000 [string::operator+=(value_type)]
0.328000 [string::push_back(value_type)]
> std::string::operator+=() slow
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: STDCXX-492
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-492
> Project: C++ Standard Library
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: 21. Strings
> Affects Versions: 4.1.3
> Environment: gcc 4.1.2 on Linux/x86_64
> Reporter: Mark Brown
> Assignee: Travis Vitek
> Fix For: 4.2
>
> Attachments: 21.string.append.perf.cpp, string.patch
>
>
> Comparing overloads of string::operator+=() in stdcxx with the same functions
> in gcc 4.1.2, stdcxx is up to twice slower than gcc:
> $ time ./op_plus_equal-stdcxx 100000000 0
> real 0m2.241s
> user 0m1.932s
> sys 0m0.204s
> $ time ./op_plus_equal-stdcxx 100000000 1
> real 0m2.540s
> user 0m2.344s
> sys 0m0.196s
> $ time ./op_plus_equal-stdcxx 100000000 2
> real 0m1.492s
> user 0m1.308s
> sys 0m0.184s
> $ time ./op_plus_equal-gcc 100000000 0
> real 0m0.883s
> user 0m0.728s
> sys 0m0.156s
> $ time ./op_plus_equal-gcc 100000000 1
> real 0m1.589s
> user 0m1.424s
> sys 0m0.168s
> $ time ./op_plus_equal-gcc 100000000 2
> real 0m1.131s
> user 0m0.976s
> sys 0m0.156s
> #include <cassert>
> #include <cstdlib>
> #include <string>
> int main (int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> const int N = argc < 2 ? 1 : std::atoi (argv [1]);
> const int op = argc < 3 ? 0 : std::atoi (argv [2]);
> std::string str;
> const std::string x ("x");
> if (op == 0) {
> for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i)
> str += 'x';
> } else if (op == 1) {
> for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i)
> str += "x";
> } else {
> for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i)
> str += x;
> }
> assert (str.size () == std::size_t (N));
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
