[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532205 ]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-235: ------------------------------------- Makes sense. I guess I should have also run the test in addition to compiling it. Thanks! > std::vector<bool>::iterators not symmetric > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: STDCXX-235 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-235 > Project: C++ Standard Library > Issue Type: Bug > Components: 23. Containers > Environment: all > Reporter: Martin Sebor > Assignee: Martin Sebor > > Moved from the Rogue Wave bug tracking database: > ****Created By: sebor @ Jun 27, 2000 01:05:10 PM**** > Chichiang Wan wrote: > > > > Chichiang Wan wrote: > > > > > > Martin, > > > > > > Iterator relation operator support is missing for vector<bool>. Is > > > there a reason for that? > > > > > > > I mean for mixing iterator and const_iterator. > Well, getting the iterators working was quite a bit of work and we just ran > out of time. (Also, given the chaos surrounding vector<bool> in general I > didn't consider it as important as all the others.) I would recommend users > to not use the class (#define _RWSTD_NO_VECTOR_BOOL). We will probably > eventually rewrite vector<bool> and the iterators but I don't think it will > happen anytime soon. I created incident #23164. > Martin > > > > -- Chichiang -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.