>Martin Sebor wrote:
>
>Travis Vitek wrote:
>>
>>
>> Travis Vitek wrote:
>>> I totally forgot about it after scrambling to get the other
>>> patch made last night. I'll post a patch for review ASAP.
>>>
>>>
>>> Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>> What is the status of the patch for the unsats for the exception
>>>> classes on Windows? Anyone working on it? Farid? Travis?
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>
>> I have verified this patch with the 4.1.3 examples compiled
>> msvc-7.1 and the 4.2.0 dll compiled with msvc-7.1. I added a
>> new conditional block for this just to avoid any issues that
>> might come up when applying the other patch to this same file.
>> Hope that doesn't cause problems for anyone.
>
>What's the rationale for constraining the patch to exclude MSVC
>8.0 and later?
>
>That mixing two different versions of the same compiler and two
>different versions of stdcxx is already known to have problems?
>I think I would just as soon not make the problem worse. Would
>you mid if I removed the _MSC_VER part of the conditional?
>
That is fine.
2007-10-18 Travis Vitek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* _config-msvc.h [_RWSTD_VER_MAJOR]: Define configuration
macros to enable binary compatibility with 4.1.3 on MSVC.
