Martin Sebor wrote: > > I've incorporated everyone's feedback and committed an updated > version with a number of enhancements of my own. Among the most > important are the new Goals section with suggested frequencies of > releases, and the integration of the Version Policy (I plan to delete > versions.html). Let me know what you think. > > http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/releases.html > Martin, I found this page that documents a few do's and dont's of binary compatibility. I realize that most of the tricky issues involve inline functions or templates, but this gives a list of the common pitfalls. http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++#The_Do.27s_and_Don.27ts Travis -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-RFC--stdcxx-release-process-tf4729351.html#a13849210 Sent from the stdcxx-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [RFC] stdcxx release process Martin Sebor
- RE: [RFC] stdcxx release process Travis Vitek
- Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process Martin Sebor
- RE: [RFC] stdcxx release process Farid Zaripov
- Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process Martin Sebor
- [RFC] stdcxx release process, second draft Martin Sebor
- RE: [RFC] stdcxx release process, second dra... Eric Lemings
- Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process, second dra... Travis Vitek
- RE: [RFC] stdcxx release process, second... Farid Zaripov
- Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process, se... Martin Sebor
- Re: [RFC] stdcxx release proces... Martin Sebor
- Re: [RFC] stdcxx release pr... Travis Vitek
- Re: [RFC] stdcxx releas... Martin Sebor
- RE: [RFC] stdcxx release proces... Eric Lemings
- RE: [RFC] stdcxx release process, second... Travis Vitek
- Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process, se... Martin Sebor
- Re: [RFC] stdcxx release proces... Mark Brown