Farid Zaripov-2 wrote:
>
>> Travis Vitek wrote:
>>
>> I have no objections. Either way, I need to look at both sets
>> of messages regardless of where they come from. So, for me,
>> moving the Jira messages to a new -issues list doesn't have
>> any significant impact.
>>
>> I guess it might be useful for users with 'dumb' e-mail
>> clients that don't have proper message filtering.
>
> My +1 for the change.
>
> I'm using the MS Outlook and filtering the JIRA messages by the
> "[jira]"
> in subject. But any reply to jira messages with "Re: [jira]" in subject
> are
> filtered also :( And Outlook dosn't provide the possibility to make more
> flexible rule :(
>
> Farid.
>
I don't know how the infra group will set this up, but I wouldn't expect the
addition of a new list to fix this problem for you. All generated messages
from jira would come from the user that modified the case and be sent to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list. Any response would appear the same. This is
how it works now.
Also, I believe that Outlook rules allow you to make a rule handle this
situation. You just add an exception to your rule that checks for the
strings "RE:" or "Re:".
Travis
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/mailing-list-for-Jira-issues--tp14248354p14260442.html
Sent from the stdcxx-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
