On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would definitely vote for metadata changes (master.stgit branch) > rather than empty commits on the main branch. Such branch may be > exported and we don't want to pollute non-stgit users. Right. > There are other things which I find useful like small notes for > patches (review comments for example) which could sit nicely in the > metadata. Git can append notes to commits nowadays, if I recall corectly. I haven't checked them out closely, but it'd be a shame to invent our own incompatible mechanism if they'd be a good fit for this. (It wouldn't surprise me if all of StGit's metadata could be sanely stored in Git notes, but let's not go there for now unless someone has a lot of free time on their hands...) -- Karl Wiberg, [email protected] subrabbit.wordpress.com www.treskal.com/kalle _______________________________________________ stgit-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/stgit-users
