On 8 June 2015 at 16:11, Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Applied, with a minor update below:
>
> On 1 June 2015 at 17:30, Peter Maydell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> --- a/t/t3300-edit.sh
>> +++ b/t/t3300-edit.sh
>> @@ -177,6 +177,12 @@ test_expect_success 'Acknowledge a patch' '
>>      test "$(msg HEAD^)" = "$m//Acked-by: C O Mitter <[email protected]>"
>>  '
>>
>> +test_expect_success 'Review a patch' '
>> +    m=$(msg HEAD^) &&
>> +    stg edit --review p1 &&
>> +    test "$(msg HEAD^)" = "$m//Reviewed-by: C O Mitter 
>> <[email protected]>"
>> +'
>
> The test failed for me since Reviewed-by doesn't have two \n after Acked-by.
>
> diff --git a/t/t3300-edit.sh b/t/t3300-edit.sh
> index f29fdf6db52b..42152ddc0ab9 100755
> --- a/t/t3300-edit.sh
> +++ b/t/t3300-edit.sh
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ test_expect_success 'Acknowledge a patch' '
>  test_expect_success 'Review a patch' '
>      m=$(msg HEAD^) &&
>      stg edit --review p1 &&
> -    test "$(msg HEAD^)" = "$m//Reviewed-by: C O Mitter 
> <[email protected]>"
> +    test "$(msg HEAD^)" = "$m/Reviewed-by: C O Mitter 
> <[email protected]>"
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'Set author' '

Weird. I could have sworn the test suite passed for me, but retrying
you're right. Thanks for applying the patch.

-- PMM

_______________________________________________
stgit-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/stgit-users

Reply via email to