FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:33:22 +1000 > Mark Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From 72e5a96969937bc68f9153d5c18af306827cf254 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Mark Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 17:54:16 +1000 >> Subject: Share common 'private' pointer. >> >> No need for smc & mmc to use different pointer. >> Use common pointer for private use. > > Yeah, cleaning them up is nice but I like to do it a bit differently. > > How about adding macro like device_type_priv or dtype_priv? > > #define device_type_priv(lu) (lu)->xxc_p > > Then we can convert smc and mmc to use it. > > And how about explanatory names like device_type_data rather than > xxc_p? > > I'm also fine with adding something like device_type_datasize to > struct device_type_template to remove the allocation from device type > modules. > > Thanks, >
Sure, leave it with me.. Cheers Mark _______________________________________________ Stgt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel
