On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Richard Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > There is a segfault in the ssc code when using it with the smc code > because it seems that bs_ssc_open is not called when you move a tape > into the transfer unit. > > I am currently looking at what the best approach is here, but it seems > the smc.c code calls target.c:dtd_load_unload which calls > backed_file_open, but it seems that nothing calls bs_thread_open, so > later when a bs_thread_cmd_submit is called, the pending_list is not > initialized and we segfault. > > I am currently wading through the code to see if I can figure out > where this should be set up. It would seem like it should be done when > we move a unit into the transfer station in the smc.c code but I am > not sure.
I was wondering if this change would do the trick: In usr/smc.c, change set_slot_full to take a target structure as well as the other args, and from that call tgt_set_device_path_update, which will also call the correct things ... and in set_slot_empty, also call tdt_set_device_path_update ... That seems like the smallest number of changes to fix the problem I am seeing ... Does anyone have any comments on the damage this might do, though? _______________________________________________ Stgt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel
