On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:07:18 +0200 Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IMHO, it's much easier to edit a plain text file rather than a XML > > file. > > The problem is the definition of a plain text file, and what happens when we > have "nested" things with different values (i.e., different luns should have > different parameters), detecting simple typos (see what will happen in "other > types" below - target vs tagret - some other target will probably get luns > which don't belong to it) in the text file etc. > > > - apache-style plain text configuration - this is what we use now > > include /some/other/*.conf > > <target iqn.2007-02.com.example:blah.blah> > backing-store /dev/blah/blah > </target> OK, the apache style looks sane (and makes sense since perl provides the libraries). Then, please invent a good format. IMHO, the format should represent all the details since we can't change the format later on easily. _______________________________________________ Stgt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/stgt-devel
