The search for a pan-India franchise
*

Regional banks have differentiated themselves from PSU banks on

asset quality and now trade at a premium to PSU banking stocks. Their

profitability and valuation differential to large private sector banks

has, however, persisted, owing to higher cost of funds, low fee income

generation and higher cost to income. The improvement on all these

three parameters, we find, is related to the quality of the liability

franchise, for which geographical diversification is the only lasting

solution. The evolution of ING Vysya Bank (IVB) also proves the

significance of geographical diversification. Even as Federal Bank (FB),

Karur Vysya Bank (KVB) and South Indian Bank (SIB) manage their

asset quality risks, their operating performance would remain

constrained due to their liability franchise. City Union Bank (CUB), on

the other hand, has done better under similar constraints and looks

likely to outperform its peers on growth and profitability.
*

*Improving the liability franchise is key: *A comparison of large private

sector banks and PSU banks with regional banks shows that regional banks

have been able to differentiate themselves from PSU banks on asset quality

(FY13 credit costs of ~60 bps vs PSU banks’ 114bps); however, they continue

to lag large private sector banks on the cost of funds (due to lower CASA),
fee

income generation and operational efficiency. Given that primary banking

relationships deliver 2-3x more business than secondary banking
relationships

in India and given that the liability relationship (rather than the lending

relationship) is the determinant of a primary banking relationship, the

improvement in the quality of the liability franchise would be a key driver
for

regional banks to bridge the profitability gap vis-à-vis large private
banks.
*

Geographical diversification proving to be a necessary evil:
*

Geographical diversification is crucial for regional banks if they are to
improve

their liability franchises. IVB has set a good example in this regard, but
the

other regional banks remain laggards on this metric and this affects their

operational performance. Regional banks’ operating profits have recorded

15% CAGR (in FY11-13) vs large private banks’ 22%.
**

*Asset quality is a key near-term risk: *The asset quality outlook for these

banks is rather bleak, with rising delinquencies and higher credit costs

looming large. Our scenario analysis shows that IVB and FB are better

cushioned on provision coverage and capital ratios.
**

*Recommend BUY on IVB, FB and CUB, SELL on KVB and SIB: *We initiate

coverage with a BUY stance on IVB (due its proven competitive advantages).

We retain our BUY stance on CUB (due to its strong growth and profitability

trends) and FB (as structural concerns on operating performance seem

discounted). We initiate coverage with a SELL stance on KVB and we change

our stance to SELL on SIB due to pressure on their profitability ratios from

deterioration in operating performance as well as due to asset quality
risks.

-- 
-- 
For Anything related with Stock market be Online at
http://www.niftyviews.com/ 

Get  free updates on your mobile phone. Sms "Join TSR " and send to 09223492234

 FOR TRIAL STOCK/NIFTY/OPTION CALLS


You received this message because you are subscribed to Google Group  
"STOCKRESEARCHER" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe email
[email protected]

for more info visit
http://groups.google.com/group/STOCKRESEARCHER?hl=en-GB
.
This is Not a Spam Mail.
Disclaimer :-
"The opinions expressed by the members on this board are based on
their individual experience and perceptions and to share information
with other members with the best of intentions to help fellow members
in investment decisions as equity investment is a risky venture."

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TEAM 
STOCKRESEARCHERS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to