Do we have enough consensus to go ahead now? I think any of us can live
with either one .. so please compute the consensus and execute :).
We need to get the show on the road ..
Sanjiva.
Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote:
Hi,
If we can decide on a folder structure for trunk, we can start move the code
from "contrib" and start to do the improvements.
We can organize the folder structure in two ways.
(1) Organize based on components and then on framework
E.g: trunk/stocktrader/
|
+-business_service
| |
| +- dotnet
| |
| +- java
| |
| +- axis2
| |
| +- PHP
|
+-order_processor
|
+-dotnet
|
+-java
(2) Organize based on framework and then on component
E.g: trunk/stocktrader/
|
+-dotnet
| |
| +- business_service
| |
| +- order_processor
| |
| +- trader_client
|
+-Java
| |
| +-business_service
| |
| +-order_processor
|
+-axis2
|
+-business_service
|
+-order_processor
Which one do you think is the better approach? IMHO, (2) is better because
when we have another application "AppXYZ", we still can have same folder
structure (first based on framework level and then on application specific
component level). Also, people are interested in how to implement using a
framework rather than how a component is implemented in different
frameworks. WDYT?
Since we are going to have code from Axis2, CXF and Metro, and all of them
are written in Java, we can identify common code and keep it inside "java"
and move framework specific code inside respective frameworks. i.e we can
have "axis2", "cxf", "metro" folders and all of them can use jar from "java"
folder.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Shankar
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/
