On Sun April 12 2009 11:18:15 pm Drew Baird (Volt) wrote:
> How about this?
> [assembly: AssemblyCompany("Apache.org - Stonehenge")]Apache.org isn't any sort of legal anything. It's just the home page of The Apache Software Foundation. Thus, that really isn't appropriate. I would just go with "Apache Stonehenge - Incubating". If in doubt, though, I suggest sending a note off to [email protected]. Dan > [assembly: AssemblyProduct(".NET StockTrader")] > [assembly: AssemblyCopyright("Apache License 2.0 applies")] > > Drew > > ________________________________________ > From: Daniel Kulp [[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 7:09 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Drew Baird (Volt) > Subject: Re: Apache License (and binaries.) > > On Fri April 10 2009 5:44:43 pm Drew Baird (Volt) wrote: > > Each CS project that produces an assembly (aka DLL) has a file called > > AssemblyInfo.cs. This will show under the properties tag in the solution > > explorer. This file does versioning and also stamps a copyright into the > > assembly's file properties so when you right click on a DLL it will show > > in the File Info properties. > > > > The business end of this code is below: > > > > [assembly: AssemblyTitle("Trade.BusinessServiceDataContract")] > > [assembly: AssemblyDescription("")] > > [assembly: AssemblyConfiguration("")] > > [assembly: AssemblyCompany("Microsoft")] > > [assembly: AssemblyProduct(".NET StockTrader")] > > [assembly: AssemblyCopyright("Copyright ? Microsoft 2008")] > > [assembly: AssemblyTrademark("")] > > [assembly: AssemblyCulture("")] > > > > How shall I treat this? Should I replace Microsoft with Apache in the > > company and copyright? (14 places for dot net) > > Can you NOT put a Copyright in there? Apache doesn't require copyrights > to be given to Apache, the original authors maintain the copyrights. > Thus, if there are any non-MS people that have contributed anything to that > code, (might not be true right now, but lets hope the community expands and > it gets there), then setting the Copyright to MS or Apache or anything > really wouldn't be legally correct. > > Is there a place for an "AssemblyLicense"? It would definitely be good to > get something about that in there. Also, if you could get "Apache > Stonehenge - Incubator" in there someplace (maybe in the description), that > would also be great. > > > Dan > > > Thanks! > > Drew > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:03 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Drew Baird (Volt) > > Subject: Re: Apache License > > > > On Tue April 7 2009 1:49:26 am Drew Baird (Volt) wrote: > > > Apache License is clear for source files > > > > > > with respect to the dotnet tree: > > > > > > 1. > > > Do graphics files need to be stamped? (File Info). Currently they are > > > not. Methinks no. > > > > Probably not. Anything "binary" really has no way to add the entire > > license thing anyway. > > > > > 2. > > > How about asemblies? Currenty these files are stamped with copyright > > > in the binary via the AssemblyInfo.cs). Methinks yes. > > > > Anything that supports comments and has any creativity expressed in it at > > all should have the license header. > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
