If there is any "creative content" in there and the file format supports comments, then there should be a license in there. Thus, files like xml and css definitely should. I don't know enough about the sql and cmd stuff to know if comments are supported.
When in doubt, add it if possible. :-) Dan On Mon April 20 2009 1:39:58 pm Drew Baird (Volt) wrote: > Hi Shankar, Dan and elders. > > I have run the RAT Tool on the dotnet tree. Please review this and let me > know how much further I should take this. > > > * I added licenses to cs, aspx, ascx. Rat tool acknowledges this > fine. > > * I did not add licenses to txt, xml, cmd, sql or css files. Should > we? > > * I did not add licenses to sln, cproj or global asax. These are > generated so I did not add > > > * And finally one loose end: > > o I did not add a license to readme.mht (We probably want to add license > to text), > > o Rat tool 'really did not like this file. I believe we want a pure html > file anyway. > > Thanks! > Drew -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
