[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12702247#action_12702247
]
S.Uthaiyashankar commented on STONEHENGE-20:
--------------------------------------------
It is an excellent document. Excellent work Ben !!!
I verified the document and didn't find any problem. Once we have DOTNET_BS ->
PHP_OPSSEC and PHP_BS->DOTNET_OPSSEC, we'll include that as well.
Shall we put it as a wiki page? What is your preference?
Regarding DOTNET_BS -> PHP_OPSSEC, I think Drew also got that working. Since
JAVA_BS -> PHP_OPSSEC works, I could not think about any problem in PHP
Configuration as well. Drew, any comments??
> Documenting how to .NET, PHP and WSAS stacks to work together
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STONEHENGE-20
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-20
> Project: Stonehenge
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Documentation
> Reporter: S.Uthaiyashankar
> Assignee: Ben Dewey
> Fix For: M1
>
> Attachments: Stonehenge Interop Grid_4-22-2009.xls, Stonehenge
> Interoperability Walkthru.doc
>
>
> Have to document what are the configurations needed to get different stacks
> to work together. I suggest we document at least following scenarios
> dotnet-client -> php-bsl -> java-opssec/java-ops
> php-client->dotnet-bsl->java-opssec/java-ops
> php-client->java-bsl->dotnet-opssec/dotnet-ops
> dotnet-client->java-bsl->dotnet-opssec/dotnet-ops
> php-client->dotnet-bsl->php-opssec/php-ops
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
