STONEHENGE-21 is different. You might have to create a separate ticket from the other issue.
Regards, Shankar On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Ben Dewey <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought STONEHENGE-21 was related to overhauling the .NET service hosts. > We had discussed, in an earlier thread, that we wanted to consider hosting > the .NET services in something becides a console app. > > If STONEHENGE-21 is different, I can create a separate ticket for the > overhaul and reference this ticket with that feature instead. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:24 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging > messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts > > Hi Ben, > > I am not clear here. STONEHENGE-21 is only to get the configurations from a > common place. It will not affect any other logic. Why do you think it will > affect the console output of .NET services? > > Regards, > Shankar > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Ben Dewey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The thought was the we could place a few Console.WriteLine() around or a > > Logging Framework in place that could write things like "Order Received", > > etc. > > > > STONEHENGE-21 is the ticket for overhauling the configuration. If > > StoneHenge-21 gets prioritized low then this feature would be an easy way > to > > fill the void. > > > > A logging framework could be designed to connect with future service > hosts > > if we plan accordingly. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Golightly [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:10 PM > > To: Stonehenge Development > > Subject: RE: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging > > messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts > > > > > > When you say there is no way to tell if the WCF services recieved the > call > > does that mean that a TraceListener does not write the output? There was > a > > suggestion that we change the .NET services to run under IIS. I would > vote > > against this if we are going to change to use IIS as the debugging > messages > > would need to be removed. > > > > > > > > Scott Golightly > > > > > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:09:30 -0700 > > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging > > messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts > > > > > > Create logging and debugging messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Key: STONEHENGE-51 > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-51 > > > Project: Stonehenge > > > Issue Type: Improvement > > > Components: DOTNET_BS, DOTNET_OPS > > > Reporter: Ben Dewey > > > Priority: Minor > > > > > > > > > It would be very useful to have debugging and logging messages in the > > .NET Console Hosts. When interoperating between platforms there is no way > to > > tell if the WCF services received the calls. > > > > > > This issue may conflict with STONEHENGE-21 > > > > > > -- > > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > > - > > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > > > > > > > -- > S.Uthaiyashankar > Software Architect > WSO2 Inc. > http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company" > -- S.Uthaiyashankar Software Architect WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
