There are still 4 "INProcess" strings references in BSL->App.config, 
TRADEService.cs (in a comment) and 2 in Utility in message strings

-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 9:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-57) Remove the InProcess Mode from .NET

Applied Patch and system operated as expected.
Have you tested with non-localhost endpoints?

Good work!
Thanks Drew


-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 9:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-57) Remove the InProcess Mode from .NET

Will do.
Drew


-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Dewey (JIRA) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 9:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-57) Remove the InProcess Mode from .NET


     [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ben Dewey updated STONEHENGE-57:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: Stonehenge-57.patch

Attached is the patch that contains the code/solution changes for this ticket.

The trade-web solution now contains 7 less project references and 17 less 
appSettings.  very good.

I tested the DOTNET Stack before building the patch and by applying it to a 
clean folder and using the ST build.bat script.

Can someone else review and test this patch before commiting?

> Remove the InProcess Mode from .NET
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STONEHENGE-57
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-57
>             Project: Stonehenge
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: DOTNET_BS, DOTNET_CLIENT, DOTNET_OPS
>            Reporter: Ben Dewey
>             Fix For: M2
>
>         Attachments: Stonehenge-57.patch
>
>
> There have been discussions on the list about removing the .NET InProcess 
> Mode.  This will reduce the complexity of the .NET Codebase.
> This issue is still up for discussion.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Reply via email to