Thanks, Ben, that would be great. There is one more thing, it's about the available options for client/bs/ops in config_service. Now .NET and PHP support different options. For example, .NET supports JAVA_CLIENT/DOTNET_CLIENT/PHP_CLIENT, while php supports JAVA_CLIENT/DOTNET_CLIENT/PHP_CLIENT/RUBY_CLIENT. In addition, same things happen in the options of BS and OPS.
Can we make them consistent in that aspect? On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Ben Dewey <[email protected]> wrote: > Avantika, > > Let's get these discrepancies addressed and change the contract names so > the Metro team can model their config contract after the .NET contract. > > You should be able to change the method name to match PHP by adding the > action parameter to the OperationContract like this. > > [OperationContract] > BSConfigResponse GetBSConfig(BSConfigRequest bs); > > To > > [OperationContract(Action="getBSConfig")] > BSConfigResponse GetBSConfig(BSConfigRequest bs); > > > -Ben Dewey > > -----Original Message----- > From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 3:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Config Service interoperability > > I just tested this and it managed to make a connection to the configuration > service but was unable to process the GetBSConfig method. I think that's > because our contract specifies this as GetBSConfig and theirs is > getBSConfig. This can be changed pretty easily. But the contracts are a > little different so all the inconsistencies should be ironed out. Is this > something you're interested in? > > ________________________________________ > From: Ben Dewey [[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:45 AM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: Config Service interoperability > > You should be able to just update the config service endpoint configuration > address to use > > http://localhost:8080/php_stocktrader/config_service/config_svc.php > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Config Service interoperability > > I have not actually tried this. I am interested in testing that but I'm not > sure how to go about it? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Dewey [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 8:51 AM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: Config Service interoperability > > Avantika, > > Although this wasn't the goal, have you by any chance tested > interoperability between the .NET and PHP config services? Does that work? > > -Ben Dewey > -- Ming Jin Consultant Thoughtworks, Inc Mobile: +86 135-2125-6300 Email: [email protected] MSN: [email protected] Blog: http://blogjava.net/mingj
